If you were to
visit Tribhuvan University Grounds these days, you could see Nepali cricketers,
led by captain Paras Khadka, in practice drills. They are busy in preparation
for the SAARC Under-25 Twenty20 Cricket, which Maldives will host.
As the boys look
sprightly during the net sessions, a rumor that yours truly heard this week
comes as a flash. The story is: Recently, President of Cricket Association of
Nepal, Binay Raj Pandey called Paras Khadka for a meeting. Paras sent a message
saying he would meet the new President of CAN, as the change of guards is
likely.
The truth in the
story cannot be verified and hence should be called a rumor. But the anecdotal
reference gives you a rough sketch of behind the scenes in Nepali cricket.
We’ve heard of Nepal cricket skipper’s dissatisfaction over CAN’s handling of
cricketers, and sometimes they’ve been justified too.
Even if the story
mentioned above is rejected completely, what cannot be undermined is that CAN
has not been able to hold elections for a new executive committee. Pandey
ascended to the throne five years ago, and has been time and again been told to
hold elections, especially after Yubraj Lama became Member Secretary of the
National Sports Council.
The scene is fast
heating, as Pandey tries to take stock of what his team has done during their
tenure. And we cannot forget the division within the executive committee due to
political appointment of some members.
Rumor mill also
has it – mentioned to this scribe on the condition of keeping it off-the-record
– that a certain section of present CAN executive committee members lobbied for
a politically affiliated head of the cricket body. Their logic was that they
already have a team, and the team can handle cricket even if the chief is a
politician. Logic seems right. One person cannot just do everything. He needs a
team to accomplish things. A good team, to be precise…
The worry is not
the logic, but the division within the so called ‘guardians’ of cricket. The
worry is, their lobby is getting stronger. The worry is, there are some
politicos from the ruling party who are providing these lobbyists with fodder,
and incentive.
In a recent
meeting, Rumesh Ratnayake, Development Officer of ACC, told the writer of these
columns, “The pace of growth of cricket in Nepal in last decade hasn’t been
what we expected. We thought it would go at 70 miles per hour but it was at
20.”
Now Rumesh was a
fast bowler as a cricketer and his love with speed can be understood. But the
gap in expectation and results has been worrisome. Ratnayake said, “At a point
we thought Nepal could achieve Test status, not only ODI.”
Somehow, the
custodians for past half a decade have to realize they’ve fallen short on
promises. Half a decade ago, Pandey was labeled a savior for Nepali cricket.
Now, he looks a sorry figure, with his comrades fast disappearing.
But what should
also be remembered is that present team inherited virtually empty coffers when
they took over and now CAN balance could read anywhere between 70-90 million
rupees. While the failings are listed, the achievements also have to be
accounted.
One
cannot deny the change needed to modernize Nepali cricket. But the change
cannot be whimsical, which is what may happen, given the stance taken by various
players in sports right now. Too much of political interest is not likely to
help the sector. We’ve already seen that with the executive committee headed by
Pandey, which was for most of its tenure, split into half.(PS: The write-up appeared in Yours Truly's weekly sports column - OFFSIDE - in The Kathmandu Post, on 22nd October, 2011)